Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 06:29:50 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org>, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r421549 - in head: . Mk Message-ID: <20160909062950.GA18015@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20160909062630.hofrsvjajt2wcel4@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201609081315.u88DF6vL044982@repo.freebsd.org> <190e2ef5-0f8c-efc3-bca1-7e5b541d3733@FreeBSD.org> <20160909062630.hofrsvjajt2wcel4@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:26:31AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > NONE is not intended to be a fallback because one hasn't set yet the LICENSE > knob[.] > > I do like the 'NONE' word, it sounds accurate and straight forward to me, > but I'm not native, if its sounds misleading we can still have a better > word if one proposes. But clearly imho UNDEFINED/UNCLEAR/UNKNOWN are > representing what we aiming at here. I agree with Mark, UNCLEAR is a nicer and having least unwanted connotations word. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160909062950.GA18015>