Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:01:20 -0500
From:      "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@riderway.com>
To:        John <nesredep@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper
Message-ID:  <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com>
In-Reply-To: <cff9f2d10711091320q7825f190r8dc373b80155a9bd@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <cff9f2d10711091320q7825f190r8dc373b80155a9bd@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John wrote:
> I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system.  Making good
> progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do
> flash.  Definite showstopper, for me.  Ok, then I tried to use the
> linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work.
> 
> It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody
> installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox.
> 
> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I
> would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox?
> 
> Is that easier?  More likely to work?
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2007-07/msg01919.html

That will work just fine using flash7.  When you need flash9, thats a
different story.

works on 6.2, 6.3, 7.0-current, 7.0-betaX, and 8.0-current.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com)
o:703.549.2050x206
Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc.
http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com
1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB  B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4734D8B0.1060200>