Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:52:59 +0100
From:      Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcODwrhyZ3Jhdg==?= <des@des.no>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: resolver change?
Message-ID:  <479CFD3B.6020806@dlr.de>
In-Reply-To: <20080127213851.506zunyhwwg4wsgs@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <86d4rn1kln.fsf@ds4.des.no> <ygeejc3ck1z.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>	<86sl0jywii.fsf@ds4.des.no> <yged4rncetu.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>	<86abmryun9.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080127213851.506zunyhwwg4wsgs@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> (from Sun, 27 Jan 2008 
> 19:45:46 +0100):
> 
>> Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> writes:
>>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> writes:
>>> > OK, so the resolver now uses a process-internal cache?  Is there 
>>> any way
>>> > to turn it off?
>>> No, our resolver doesn't have a process-internal cache at all.
>>
>> So what's going on?
>>
>> Looking back through my logs, it was working correctly as late as
>> January 13, so something broke between then and January 21.
>>
>> My name server does *not* forward queries, it goes straight to the
>> source.  Everything looks fine if I run host(1) multiple times, it only
>> seems to fail when successive lookups are made from the same process.
> 
> Are you seeing this with or without activated nscd/cached?

I see the same effect as DES. Tried to disable hosts caching in nscd. 
Didn't change anything.

harti




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?479CFD3B.6020806>