Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:16:01 -0400 From: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> To: Sergey Manucharian <sm@ara-ler.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What builds go to snapshots? Message-ID: <7a18b73e-94ce-ea02-db0a-337deef5b4b3@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20160523141050.GG5169@debian.ara-ler.com> References: <20160523033341.GS1388@dendrobates.araler.com> <6f2cf206-38da-a6aa-a8a4-b407aee85786@freebsd.org> <20160523141050.GG5169@debian.ara-ler.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2016-05-23 10:10, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > Excerpts from Allan Jude's message from Sun 22-May-16 23:55: >> On 2016-05-22 23:33, Sergey Manucharian wrote: >>> Is there any materialistic definition of those builds, which >>> become snapshots at [0]? >>> >>> - Sergey >>> >>> [0] ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ISO-IMAGES/11.0/ >>> >> The snapshots are built with the scripts/makefiles in the 'release' >> subdirectory of the source tree. > > Thanks, Alan! But how is it determined/decided which particular build > goes to "snapshots"? E.g. the latest builds are of May 18, why not of > May 15 or 16? > > S. > That is just whenever the release engineers have time to build a snapshot. There are not usually any special considerations. -- Allan Jude
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7a18b73e-94ce-ea02-db0a-337deef5b4b3>