Date: Sun, 29 Jun 1997 03:58:45 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.COM> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/ghostscript5 ... Message-ID: <19970629035845.07965@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <97Jun14.114823pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>; from Bill Fenner on Sat, Jun 14, 1997 at 11:48:15AM -0800 References: <97Jun14.114823pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > BTW, should we nuke ghostscript4 ??? Does somebody know if any > > port needs gs4 ??? > > (But this does raise the question of why doesn't ghostview depend on > ghostscript?) Too complex to handle. Ghostview (and gv) needs *any* version of ghostscript to work. So if I prefer ghostscript3 and we hardwire ghostscript4 into these ports, then my ghostscript3 gets overwritten when I install ghostview/gv. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970629035845.07965>