Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:40:41 -0500
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        Barry Pederson <bp@barryp.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: Major CAM performance regression
Message-ID:  <200903031840.n23IeXuk032580@lava.sentex.ca>
In-Reply-To: <49AD6130.8040703@barryp.org>
References:  <499551B9.7050805@samsco.org> <200902172307.n1HN74ml025580@pyroxene.sentex.ca> <49AD6130.8040703@barryp.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:56 AM 3/3/2009, Barry Pederson wrote:

>I can report a "metoo" on a 7.0-RELEASE-p3 machine with an Areca 
>ARC-1212 card and SATA drives.  "camcontrol tags da0" reports:
>
>         (pass0:arcmsr0:0:0:0): device openings: 1
>
>The machine is just a dog sometimes.  Haven't tried the patch though.


RELENG_7 has all the fixes in.  There seem to be quite a few cam 
fixes plus the one areca fix.  With the patches, post reboot I now see

da1: Command Queueing Enabled

raw throughput seems to be the same (which is should). It when there 
are multiple reads/writes that the biggest difference should show up.

         ---Mike 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903031840.n23IeXuk032580>