Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:31:38 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Cc:        mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 4.0 a severe disappointment 
Message-ID:  <200003231631.JAA41493@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:29:04 MST." <200003231629.JAA02977@nomad.yogotech.com> 
References:  <200003231629.JAA02977@nomad.yogotech.com>  <200003231618.JAA02894@nomad.yogotech.com> <imp@village.org> <200003230551.WAA37833@harmony.village.org> <200003230830.IAA00509@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <200003231624.JAA41343@harmony.village.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200003231629.JAA02977@nomad.yogotech.com> Nate Williams writes:
: And to add to this, the entire resource allocation scheme in the cards
: can be safely ignored for the most part.  Some of the drivers (most
: notably sio) want the card to use the same resources as they expect, but
: those resources are assigned by pccardd/kernel, and can be almost
: anything that doesn't conflict with already existing devices..

sio no longer has this restriction.  It will use whatever address
pccardd tells it to use.  However, most of the entries are setup to be 
one of the COMx ports while sio still had this restriction.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003231631.JAA41493>