Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 18:54:44 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Stephen J. Roznowski" <sjr1@flash.net> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/2943: standard-supfile missing src-release and src-tools Message-ID: <15793.858135284@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Mar 1997 20:55:32 EST." <199703120155.UAA01343@istari.flash.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm confused. I'm presently using sup (sup.freebsd.org) to maintain > my private source code tree... Which is fine, but as we don't offer it from any of our servers anymore why put up our config files? :) That doesn't interfere with your own use of sup and declutters the tree. > > Anyone mind if I just nuke the whole examples/sup directory in > > response to this PR? > > Also, I find this a little disturbing. > > Currently sup is located in /usr/src/usr.sbin/sup and as such I believe > it is "supported". I don't see cvsup anywhere in the /usr/src tree (I Actually, you're just a wee bit late with this - it left the tree yesterday. :-) But since it's still available as a port, you're safe. > believe that it is still only available as a port). I think that cvsup > should be imported into /usr/src/contrib and built as part on the normal > build before sup goes away... Heh, you'd have to bring the whole Modula-3 development environment in as well then. :) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15793.858135284>