Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:48:18 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel Message-ID: <479C5362.20806@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.1.00.0801261622030.16534@ync.qbhto.arg> References: <479B91C5.5050002@FreeBSD.org> <479BBDFA.9090303@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.1.00.0801261622030.16534@ync.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > I handled this in portmaster by analyzing the CONFLICTS. If a requested > dependency has a CONFLICTS line I check the glob patterns against the > installed ports with pkg_info and keep going if we already have > something installed that will work. > > That's not a perfect solution, but it handles all the cases I've seen > personally, or users complained about before that feature was introduced. > > hope this helps, Thanks Doug. It sounds reasonable. I'll think to implement it. -- Dixi. Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?479C5362.20806>