Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:56:42 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Old 4.0-R binaries remaining in 4.1.1-S Message-ID: <20001023215642.C9377@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.001023124528.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 12:45:28PM -0700 References: <20001023213434.B9377@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> <XFMail.001023124528.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 12:45:28PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 23-Oct-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 09:30:16PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > > >> The /usr/share/man and the perl man trees are rewritten by the installworld > >> target. Since make world does not deal with ports, /usr/local/share/man is > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > which certainly should be /usr/local/man. > > Nope. manpages are not machine dependent (i.e., they aren't different between > x86, alpha, ia64, etc.). We use /usr/share, /usr/local/share, and > /usr/X11R6/share for things which are machine independent and thus can be > shared across all architectures. Since manpages are machine independent, > they go in /usr/share/man, /usr/local/share/man, /usr/X11R6/share/man, etc. > See the heir(7) manpage for more info. Probably they should. But on my system, there is /usr/share/man and /usr/local/man. There is no /usr/local/share/man. See /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk for info, esp the MANPREFIX variable.:-) -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szeged University Szeged Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001023215642.C9377>