Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:35:55 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/share/sgml release.ent Message-ID: <20031027153555.GB39816@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031027.083317.54187409.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20031027093150.GA58637@regency.nsu.ru> <20031027030448.A67575@FreeBSD.org> <20031027121613.GB17552@regency.nsu.ru> <20031027.083317.54187409.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 08:33:17AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20031027121613.GB17552@regency.nsu.ru> > Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> writes: > : On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:04:48AM -0800, Max Khon wrote: > : > Hello! > : > > : > On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:31:50PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > : > > : > > > bmah 2003/10/26 21:37:00 PST > : > > > > : > > > FreeBSD src repository > : > > > > : > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4_9) > : > > > release/doc/share/sgml release.ent > : > > > Log: > : > > > The next release of FreeBSD will most likely be 4.9.1, according to > : > > > current RE plans. > : > > > : > > I'd like to see 4.10 someday though. 4.x set a de-facto standard WRT > : > > security, robustness, and overall excellent general- (and all-) purpose > : > > operating system. Seems like it deserves 10th incarnation. 8-) > : > > : > there will be problems if it will be called 4.10. > : > at least with __FreeBSD_version. > : > : Hmm, I seem to recall a conversation from where I've got an impression > : that in FreeBSD X.Y, Y can go from 0 through 9, 10, ..., 99 up to 100. > : I'll take a look closed at __FreeBSD_version, thanks. > > in 5.x that's true, but in 4.x, only 0-9 were considered for Y. The > __FreeBSD_version will decode as 4.9.1, even if we call it 4.10. Thanks for straighting things out! ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031027153555.GB39816>