Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:16:03 +0200
From:      Willy Offermans <Willy@Offermans.Rompen.nl>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: control of order of inet devices
Message-ID:  <20130805091603.GB4557@vpn.offrom.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20130417200127.GB30583@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
References:  <20130416135621.GE3286@vpn.offrom.nl> <20130416154423.GD98205@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20130417091408.GG3480@vpn.offrom.nl> <516E6B10.2080000@gmail.com> <20130417200127.GB30583@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Brooks,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 03:01:27PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:27:44AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > On 4/17/2013 4:14 AM, Willy Offermans wrote:
> > > This is what I read in some of the articles or handbook as well. Can I
> > > reorder this linked list? Can I control the order by creating the kernel
> > > and reordering the inclusion of the device drivers?
> > >
> > > I am aware that the request sounds silly, but I have a third party program
> > > which checks its licence against the first inet device. Since I have added
> > > a new inet controller, the sequence has changed. Of course I ask for a new
> > > licence, but they want to charge me for that and I do not see any reason
> > > for that.
> > 
> > Load old inet devices like normal, in loader.conf.  Then load the new 
> > device driver before networking, after rc's started.  If it'd because of 
> > probe order, then you might just have to control the probe order the 
> > hard way.  If the program's calling ifconfig itself, you could write a 
> > wrapper to resort the output.  And call a lawyer, getting a new ethernet 
> > card shouldn't void a license.
> 
> It wouldn't be particularly hard to influence the sorting of the list if
> you're willing to modify the if_attach_internal() function and always
> insert devices with that name at the beginning.  It just doesn't seem
> very general purpose so I'd have a hard time considering including it.
> 
> -- Brooks

I see und subscribe to your point. However it is not clear to me how the
order is established. Maybe if I know that, I can influence the order. Can
you comment on that?

Where can I find the code for the if_attach_internal() function? Digging
into the code might also elucidate a lot of things, so I need to ask less
:). Maybe I will change the code a bit to suite my wishes. If that is the
case, I will inform the list and show the code. Maybe it is useful.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With kind regards,
Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
De jrus wah,

Wiel

*************************************
 W.K. Offermans
Home:   +31 45 544 49 44
Mobile: +31 681 15 87 68
e-mail: Willy@Offermans.Rompen.nl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130805091603.GB4557>