Date: 21 Jan 2002 13:47:38 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review Message-ID: <xzpd703zx91.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020121030414.GA30777@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200201202314.g0KNEDt34526@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20020120233050.GA26913@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpvgdw1sqp.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121000446.GB27206@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpn0z81rrr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121002557.GB27831@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpelkk1qnb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121004906.GA28231@nagual.pp.ru> <xzp665w1otd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121025009.GA30673@nagual.pp.ru> <20020121030414.GA30777@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > Please explain two moments: > > 1) What is stack reaction on this option? Is it the same like PAM_AUTH_ERR > reaction or not? Yes. > 2) Can PAM_SYSTEM_ERR be returned by pam_authenticate() ? If yes. login.c > and ftpd.c must be fixed to add this code. All PAM library calls can return PAM_SYSTEM_ERR. ...but I just realized it's the wrong code in this case - modules should return PAM_SERVICE_ERR instead of PAM_SYSTEM_ERR. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpd703zx91.fsf>