Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 19:59:42 -0400 From: Brian Minard <bminard@flatfoot.ca> To: pjklist@ekahuna.com Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade / pkgdb question Message-ID: <15589.39278.702404.618292@yop.flatfoot.ca> In-Reply-To: <20020517224745963.AAA345@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com> References: <20020517132846380.AAA341@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com> <20020517224745963.AAA345@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 17, 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote: > Also, why would simply redirecting standard output to a file avoid > portupgrade running anyway? I would think that would just send the > runtime messages to a file? Aren't you thinking of pkg_version -c? > Pkg_version appears to be able to determine versions without a valid > "origin", unlike portversion/portupgrade. Yes, use the -Oc option with pkg_version and take a close look at the generated script, if you choose to use it. I think you need the -O option to get around the checks for the origin. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15589.39278.702404.618292>