Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:23:26 +0200
From:      Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
To:        Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Are ports supposed to build and run on 10-CURRENT?
Message-ID:  <20130624202326.2a6111a6@bsd64.grem.de>
In-Reply-To: <51C888C2.2040706@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20130613031535.4087d7f9@bsd64.grem.de> <EF830CD7-00F1-4628-8515-76133BBE85E7@FreeBSD.org> <C1CC40FC-4489-4164-96B7-5E1A25DCB37F@FreeBSD.org> <51C888C2.2040706@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:58:26 +0200
Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Am 22.06.2013 00:27, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
> 
> > Attached is a diff to fix the db5 port, so it correctly builds with
> > CXXFLAGS?=-std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++.  Matthias, could you please
> > have a look at it?
> 
> Does databases/db6 as a requisite make your failing port compile
> properly?

The port failing to build using c++11 is databases/db5 itself. The port
depending on db5 that raised the question is devel/ice, which might
build with db6, but upstream only developed and tested it using
db5, so sticking to that version is preferred.

-- 
Michael Gmelin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130624202326.2a6111a6>