Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:10:39 -0600
From:      "Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com>
To:        Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg>
Cc:        freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Logo Contest
Message-ID:  <200502092210.39490.algould@datawok.com>
In-Reply-To: <420ACD5E.3030708@pacific.net.sg>
References:  <200502091349.00708.algould@datawok.com> <420ACD5E.3030708@pacific.net.sg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 08:56 pm, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this all sounds like a very stupid idea to me.
>
> This also sounds like the effort in the EU banning the swastika not
> seeing that some two billion people using it as a religious symbol.

No.  Your statement would be correct if Beastie were losing his status 
as the mascot.  Beastie is retaining his status as the mascot.

>
> I never ever heard that a company has chosen a product because of its
> logo.
>
> Do you believe that Windows is this successful because of its logo?
>
> Erich
>

FreeBSD has a powerful, serious, professional side that Beastie does not 
express well.  I think a  new logo, in addition to having Beastie as a 
mascot, would help create an image for FreeBSD that is more complete 
and accurate.  A symbol should never become more important than the 
object/concept/principle it symbolizes.

All religious and Political Correctness issues aside, do you have any 
objections to a more complete and accurate image for FreeBSD?

Andrew Gould



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502092210.39490.algould>