Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:03:54 +0300
From:      Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dmitriy Demidov <dima_bsd@inbox.lv>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: keep-state rules inadequately handles big UDP packets or fragmented IP packets?
Message-ID:  <49BBB94A.7040208@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200903132246.49159.dima_bsd@inbox.lv>
References:  <200903132246.49159.dima_bsd@inbox.lv>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitriy Demidov wrote:
> Unbound starts working only then I put in ipfw this set of rules to handle all UDP packets outside from keep-state rules:
> add allow udp from any to any

What if you add:

add allow ip from any to any frag

instead the line above?

> add check-state
> add deny icmp from any to any frag

I'm not sure the line above is correct.

> add allow icmp from any to me icmptypes 0,3,11
> add allow icmp from me to any out keep-state
> add allow tcp from me to any out keep-state
> add allow udp from me to any out keep-state
> add deny ip from any to any
> 
> It looks like dynamicaly created rules some how inadequately handles big UDP packets (DNSSEC answers are big).
> Is there any who can help to investigate this issue (looks like I can't do it myself)?
> Can it be ipfw related issue?

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49BBB94A.7040208>