Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 00:54:07 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: George Neville-Neil <gnn@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: FUSE kernel module for the kernel... Message-ID: <20120308225407.GV75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <C55C880E-8DA3-42A8-9837-32D4B02FD742@FreeBSD.org> References: <C55C880E-8DA3-42A8-9837-32D4B02FD742@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xY23VHacxCa7rROP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 04:20:24PM -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote: > Howdy, >=20 > I've taken the GSoC work done with the FUSE kernel module, and created > a patch against HEAD which I have now subjected to testing using > tools/regression/fsx. > > The patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~gnn/head-fuse-1.diff > > I would like to commit this patch in the next few days, so, please, if > you care about this take a look and get back to me. I just took a very quick look, and the code has all usual bugs. E.g., the filesystem is marked mpsafe, while insmntque() is performed before new vnode is initialized. The fuse was known to cause random kernel memory corruption, were the issues identified and fixed ? Who is going to maintain the code ? I once objected strongly for throwing the fuse into svn without first fixing bugs, and having a maintainer. --xY23VHacxCa7rROP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9ZOI4ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iBvQCbBiWZWhTI8JrheJIDf48ZrEnF YG0Anjsa8jmoWzSeLEkbeRJFQVyA6azP =Ur65 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xY23VHacxCa7rROP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120308225407.GV75778>