Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:32:55 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Cc:        "=?utf-8?Q?freebsd-arch=40freebsd.org?=" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Including <sys/disk*.h> without getting ioctl(2) defines
Message-ID:  <16610.1474925575@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <etPan.57e9475f.18472693.e1fd@xcllnt.net>
References:  <etPan.57e9475f.18472693.e1fd@xcllnt.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--------
In message <etPan.57e9475f.18472693.e1fd@xcllnt.net>, Marcel Moolenaar writes:

>4. Get rid of the utilities that still use the ioctl(2) interface
>and fix ports that do the same.

That would be the most say way: Forward.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16610.1474925575>