Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:48:11 +0100 From: "jesk" <jesk@killall.org> To: "Justin Hopper" <jhopper@bsdhosting.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysql - Linuxthreads : Still needed? Message-ID: <002d01c4ca48$3312e970$45fea8c0@turbofresse> References: <1099935987.4899.1730.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <001701c4c69e$1e81c510$45fea8c0@turbofresse> <20041109221544.3815fd48.thib@mi.is> <200411101101.32258.michael.riexinger@de.clara.net> <20041113080807.GJ1807@suricate.otoh.org> <009701c4c9c6$fc9c5d30$45fea8c0@turbofresse> <1100388569.5412.252.camel@work.gusalmighty.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is unfortunate, since 4.1.7 is the recommended release from MySQL > AB. Does anyone know why 4.0 is faster, or is it only faster in some > cases (anybody have any benchmarks?) ? > > 50% is quite a large margin and I'm sure most people, myself included, > are looking for maximum performance. I cant repeat my tests to show you topically benchmark results at the moment. But why dont you find out how it performance in your own conditions and then share your experiences with us?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002d01c4ca48$3312e970$45fea8c0>