Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:00:00 +0200
From:      Lothar Braun <lothar@lobraun.de>
To:        rwatson@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Sysinstall is still inadequate after all of these years
Message-ID:  <486C8700.5020100@lobraun.de>
In-Reply-To: <20080702235800.H47773@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <784966050807021123l267aa20en39eb513c12c90ad2@mail.gmail.com> <20080702235800.H47773@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote:
> My 
> primary concern about some of these replacement installer projects is 
> that they've placed a strong focus on making them graphical -- I 
> actually couldn't care less about GUIs (and I think they actually hurt 
> my configurations, since I use serial consoles a lot), but what I do 
> want is a very tight and efficient install process, which I feel 
> sysinstall does badly on (not just for the reasons you specify).

Hmm, how should a tight and efficient installation process look like in 
your opinion? And what are the other points that are bad in systinstall?

Regards,
   Lothar



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?486C8700.5020100>