Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:57:07 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: "Alexander Sack" <pisymbol@gmail.com> Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does adding /usr/lib32 to LD_LIBRARY_PATH break 64-bit binaries? Message-ID: <20081025095707.5226d663@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <3c0b01820810250549r6c1f5614i27709c09d73a2018@mail.gmail.com> References: <3c0b01820810231731s1b4d4659j7d1df8bf4abb229c@mail.gmail.com> <20081024104232.X21603@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081024125059.GE1137@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200810250958.15130.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <3c0b01820810250549r6c1f5614i27709c09d73a2018@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/2CvL_Ijs54QK/nIFimt1iHp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:49:19 -0400 "Alexander Sack" <pisymbol@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > Is this a bug or not in FreeBSD's rtld? >=20 > -aps It is not. In case it was not clear before, I maintain that you _ask_ rtld for wrong behaviour and you get back what you asked for, down to the letter. 'Tasting' libraries just because someone somewhere want to screw up their configuration does not seem right to me at all. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/2CvL_Ijs54QK/nIFimt1iHp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFJAyWzQ6z1jMm+XZYRAsLcAJ94HFDpsdXLEFu6tM1HTaehE2etPACgiZ79 qRODaSlnqzoO4FYfPJNwoQQ= =ADcG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2CvL_Ijs54QK/nIFimt1iHp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081025095707.5226d663>