Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:19:59 -0500
From:      pauls@utdallas.edu
To:        Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>, Atom Powers <atom.powers@gmail.com>
Cc:        Darrin Chandler <dwchandler@stilyagin.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" <freebsd@hub.org>
Subject:   Re: BSDstats: Just added - Vendor Stats
Message-ID:  <DC79E9EBFD31A82C3C695D4C@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>
In-Reply-To: <ef10de9a0608262208k7d53fb3cs3c8623dab998f782@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20060826223927.I82634@hub.org> <20060827020210.GA9218@zloy.stilyagin.com> <df9ac37c0608262100w59ee80d9maa58902d5dd35c24@mail.gmail.com> <ef10de9a0608262208k7d53fb3cs3c8623dab998f782@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========62557ED73F28F8C5645D==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

--On August 27, 2006 12:08:55 AM -0500 Nikolas Britton=20
<nikolas.britton@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What I think is interesting is the only ~50% uptake of FreeBSD/amd64
> on 64-bit x86 capable systems. FreeBSD/i386 takes ~90% of the pie.
> Also the less then 1% uptake of sparc64 and alpha ports and 0% for
> FreeBSD/PPC. Maybe we should can some of these platform ports, how
> much overhead do they add to the project?
>
I don't think you have nearly enough systems inventoried to make decisions =

like that.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

--==========62557ED73F28F8C5645D==========--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DC79E9EBFD31A82C3C695D4C>