Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Jun 1998 09:13:14 PDT
From:      Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner), peter@netplex.com.au, joelh@gnu.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Bogus errno twiddling by lstat... 
Message-ID:  <199806231613.JAA05642@mango.parc.xerox.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Jun 1998 22:38:28 PDT." <199806230538.WAA23776@usr01.primenet.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199806230538.WAA23776@usr01.primenet.com>you write:
>That goes a long way towards explaining why they felt free to
>screw it up, I suppose...

You misunderstood.  My impression was that most of the ANSI C committee
didn't like how much of a hack the errno interface was (e.g. this little
discussion we're having) but nobody had the stomach to replace it with
something better but not backwards-compatible.

  Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806231613.JAA05642>