Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:38:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com> To: "Michael J. Caughey" <mcaughey@mgsinc.com> Cc: "Michael J. Caughey" <mcaughey@mgsinc.com>, Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>, Pete Kruckenberg <pete@dsw.com>, Julian Howard Stacey <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Byet April 95 no ref to screennd Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950710103740.2643C-100000@haven.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.950710131831.mcaughey@loc10.mgsinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Jul 1995, Michael J. Caughey wrote: > I can see what your trying to say. I don't want to get into a heated flame war > here, so let me explain myself. I simply asked if I could purchase the Product from > him, Paul Vixie, and he said he could not legally do so. I never mentioned "legally > validate its security". He said, his hands were tied legally to sell it. When I > tried to set up some kind of support plan with him he said, no problem. Then said he > wasn't sure if he could legally do that. Of course this wasn't definate, but it was > left to that about three weeks ago and I have yet to here from him. I started talking > with him about three or four weeks pirior to that. What does this have to do with the security of the screend? That is just a licensing problem with DEC (who by the way includes screend with Ultrix and OSF). Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950710103740.2643C-100000>