Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 23:43:45 -0800 From: Jeremy Lea <reg@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: Mikhail Kruk <meshko@cs.brandeis.edu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: qt2 vs qt, moc2 vs moc Message-ID: <20001223234345.A388@shale.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <20001224021212.A305@argon.firepipe.net>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 02:12:12AM -0500 References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012240206120.4087-100000@daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu> <20001224021212.A305@argon.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 02:12:12AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> just isn't flexible enough. GTK had the right idea with GTK_CONFIG
> though.. at least only one hack would have to be used.
Or none if people follow the rules, and always use ${GTK_CONFIG} from
the environment...
-Jeremy
--
FreeBSD - Because the best things in life are free...
http://www.freebsd.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001223234345.A388>