Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org>, FreeBSD Hackers List <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: swap & huge mem systems
Message-ID:  <200207090527.g695R23C049724@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <20020708212522.N945-100000@april.chuckr.org> <20020709015454.GA6323@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <3D2A4DDB.75F8561B@mindspring.com> <20020709050048.GA27599@HAL9000.wox.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:Thus spake Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>:
:> Erik Trulsson wrote:
:> > Minimal swap if you want to be able to catch core dumps: Physical RAM
:> > size + 64K
:
:I've caught many core dumps with swap == RAM.  Am I just getting
:lucky, or am I losing 64K of the image?
:
:> Crash dumps good.
:
:I beg to differ. ;-)

    You only need as much as physical ram.  e.g. 1G of ram, 1G on the
    dump device (which can be the swap partition).

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207090527.g695R23C049724>