Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:42:01 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: Sergey Skvortsov <skv@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ssldump/files patch-ssl%ssldecode.c Message-ID: <20060120114200.GF81772@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <43D0C93D.1050704@FreeBSD.org> References: <200601201014.k0KAEMQ5053386@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060120102934.GB1026@k7.mavetju> <43D0BE68.6010403@FreeBSD.org> <20060120105326.GC1026@k7.mavetju> <43D0C93D.1050704@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Y+xroYBkGM9OatJL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:27:57PM +0300, Sergey Skvortsov wrote: > Edwin Groothuis wrote: > >> > >> Edwin Groothuis wrote: > >>>> FreeBSD ports repository > >>>> > >>>> Added files: > >>>> net/ssldump/files patch-ssl%ssldecode.c=20 > >>> Did I miss a naming-convention change? > > > >> History repeats itself... Ok. > >> > >> 1. I dislike "_" as path delimiter. It's not so obvious and aesthetic = as > >> "::" or "%". > >=20 > > I don't like it neither, but I accepted the fact that there was a > > proper naming standard for it so at least this wildgrowth of patch > > files would be resolved. >=20 > First of all, it is not a "proper naming standard". I always suggest to > use SHOULD/MUST/etc words (RFC 2119) in "Porters' Handboook" to avoid > any incomprehension. In current situation I prefer to treat "Please only > use characters [-+._a-zA-Z0-9]" as "You SHOULD use characters > [-+._a-zA-Z0-9]". >=20 > Many committers do not like this "convention". Hence the above regex > should be reviewed and extended. There is no technical problems with > additional ":%" symbols. Patch names must be convenient, not procrustean. >=20 Please, this has been discussed so many times before without any resolve until portmgr put in this policy. Instead of restarting the whole discussing for the 117th time, please agree to disagree and accept this policy. If you really have to take up this discussion again, please do so in the appropriate channels and not by unilaterally committing something different. Now please people, take a deep breath and move on. -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// erwin@FreeBSD.org And it makes you cry. <____) (____> erwin@aauug.dk --Y+xroYBkGM9OatJL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD0MyIqy9aWxUlaZARAgpHAKDxilLMTlwVXUJTGt+uq+eUhJmtggCgrb5B T8Lhqp30LBRnE9GtOev5HBg= =5yvk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y+xroYBkGM9OatJL--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060120114200.GF81772>