Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 03:09:31 -0700 From: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/windowmaker Makefile distinfo pkg-plistports/x11-wm/windowmaker/files patch-am patch-wsetfont Message-ID: <3B1223DB.D6D4F2E7@DougBarton.net> References: <200105271531.f4RFV6u31074@freefall.freebsd.org> <3B120575.AC6CBC72@DougBarton.net> <3B121EC3.C319ED27@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > This is probably a good way to go with this, but the wmicons port has
> > severe fetch'ing problems. None of the first several files could be found
> > on any of the master sites, they all had to be fetched from
> > ftp.freebsd.org. Given the long connection time outs and delays I finally
> > gave up and deleted all the master sites from the Makefile so I'm not sure
> > about the rest of the stuff.
>
> Ok, I'll look into this problem.
Cool, thanks.
> > > 3. due to (1) bump PORTREVISION.
> >
> > (Once again,) I really think we need to be more conservative with bumping
> > this. The end result of what you get with this change is exactly the same,
> > with the addition of a few new icons. IMO that doesn't amount to a change
> > in functionality, so it doesn't deserve to be bumped.
>
> You are not quite correct. As my message clearly indicates, PORTREVISION was bumped not due to icons,
> but due to two additional patches backported from i18n version of the port.
Yes, I saw that, however at best those two patches slightly improve the
install, they don't actually produce any functional changes I could see. Of
course, the way this week has been I'm probably missing something. Perhaps
you could enlighten me?
--
I need someone really bad. Are you really bad?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B1223DB.D6D4F2E7>