Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:13:22 -0600
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To:        Andreas Davour <ante@Update.UU.SE>
Cc:        Chris Maness <chris@chrismaness.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tracking Security in Ports and Base System
Message-ID:  <20060210191322.GD2090@dan.emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602101301510.17814@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
References:  <43EA9782.7060708@chrismaness.com> <43EA9DA4.4040206@mac.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602101301510.17814@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Feb 10), Andreas Davour said:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >Chris Maness wrote:
> >>How should I set up cvsup to just track security updates for ports. 
> >>And would the best thing to do after I synced CVS, do portupgrade
> >>-a so that everything selected gets rebuilt.
> >>
> >>What is the equivalent for the base system?
> >
> >The ports tree isn't branched; just get HEAD (aka ".") and you'll
> >get the most current version with the most recent security updates. 
> >You might want to install security/portaudit, however, which is a
> >very useful tool.
> 
> Which makes me finally throw out a question I've been wondering
> about.  Is there no way of getting a specific tagged ports tree, if
> you'd like to get a ports tree the way it looked when, say,
> 4.6-RELEASE came out?

Use a tag of RELEASE_4_6_0 .

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060210191322.GD2090>