Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:55:20 +0200 From: Philipp Wuensche <cryx-freebsd@h3q.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virally licensed code in FreeBSD kernel Message-ID: <46211588.6080403@h3q.com> In-Reply-To: <200704141743.LAA09173@lariat.net> References: <200704140121.TAA29887@lariat.net> <4620D1DD.5050902@h3q.com> <200704141551.JAA07865@lariat.net> <4621078B.6070302@h3q.com> <200704141743.LAA09173@lariat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brett Glass wrote: > At 10:55 AM 4/14/2007, Philipp Wuensche wrote: > >> Example: >> You create a binary from two source files. >> >> 1. one BSD one CDDL. If you distribute this binary, you have to provide >> the CDDL part (and all modifications to it) as source under CDDL >> license. You are not required to provide the source of the BSD part. > > Yes, you are. Because it appears that the whole thing is now covered > by the CDDL. I can't see any signs for that in the CDDL license, not if you read 3.1 with the Definitions in point 1. greetings, philipp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46211588.6080403>