Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 09:05:48 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, nate@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/323 Message-ID: <199605270705.JAA05986@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199605262319.RAA24370@rocky.sri.MT.net> from Nate Williams at "May 26, 96 05:19:29 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Nate Williams wrote: > > Synopsis: Creating lost+found causes fsck to stop fsck -y FDIV017 > > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->nate > > Responsible-Changed-By: scrappy > > Responsible-Changed-When: Sun May 26 13:45:07 PDT 1996 > > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > did terry's patch include fix for this? > > Nope, it just fixed the bug where fsck needed multiple passes to fix > broken FS. Wasn't there basic agreement that we should re-enable newfs' capability of creating the lost+found, and make this the default? (Last time i tried, it didn't even compile, however.) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605270705.JAA05986>