Date: 28 May 1999 14:05:16 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, junkmale@xtra.co.nz, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FTP passive mode - a new default? Message-ID: <xzpogj5o0w3.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Doug White's message of "Thu, 27 May 1999 11:07:24 -0700 (PDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9905271100280.16577-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> writes: > I second the suggestion to 'autoprobe' PASV support, and revert to active > mode (w/ an appropriate msg) if PASV is refused. No. Ncftp tries to do this, and provides adequate proof that it is not practical. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpogj5o0w3.fsf>