Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:58:21 +0200 From: Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Increase DFLDSIZ on amd64? Message-ID: <CAOfDtXPKruryjq1U-rjAJo7ivKZLWLHDEw14SB7k0kmsHhy75A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120420185543.GU2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <CAOfDtXMSQ_iT8zQKjrQ-4AxFDtNoNNj-7-=kXGT6RdOMOtyXUA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGE5yCqQ=_XysKwQcdu2DUeycp33TzRd0H0FwT-ufitQpGzXPw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOfDtXOqj6ozTSGCiUZ3HCfXwx%2B6aTwtj7bZ1rxQwz32iEb1kA@mail.gmail.com> <20120420185543.GU2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 20 d=E2=80=99abril de 2012 20:55, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.c= om> ha escrit: > Just for record, this is not an issue with dynamic linker. > Kernel image activator returns error if data segment size is larger > then RLIMIT_DATA value, see imgact_elf.c:901. I see. So if it can't be handled gracefully in userland, the more reason to avoid it... Is there any objection to increasing DFLDSIZ as proposed? --=20 Robert Millan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOfDtXPKruryjq1U-rjAJo7ivKZLWLHDEw14SB7k0kmsHhy75A>