Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Aug 2001 06:34:26 +0000
From:      Kevin Way <kevin.way@overtone.org>
To:        Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org>
Subject:   Re: import NetBSD rc system
Message-ID:  <20010814063426.A76746@bean.overtone.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108132308150.29344-100000@smtp.gnf.org>; from gordont@gnf.org on Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:10:43PM -0700
References:  <20010814054348.A5361@bean.overtone.org> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108132308150.29344-100000@smtp.gnf.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:10:43PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> Here's my big question. Do we try to maintain our boot order? Or are we
> going to go with the boot order as presented by the NetBSD stuff?

I don't see any reason to force the boot order to be maintained.  As long
as the dependancies are set correctly, i'd think the boot order would be
determined solely by the output of rcorder.

What am I missing?

-Kevin Way

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010814063426.A76746>