Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:52:42 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Mantzios Achilleus <mantzios@softlab.ece.ntua.gr> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Various threading libs Message-ID: <20031121125242.GH18581@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311211448090.31416-100000@theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr> References: <20031121122531.GG18581@starjuice.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311211448090.31416-100000@theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2003/11/21 14:48), Mantzios Achilleus wrote: > > JBoss-3.2.1 is working well on my 5.1-CURRENT (4 days old) workstation, > > hosting a heavy-weight J2EE application, although only as a testbed for > > the operator of the workstation (me). > > > > This is with SCHED_ULE and libkse, which used to panic my box, then > > locked up IntelliJ IDEA and now seems to have stabilized. > > What has IntelliJ IDEA to do with SCHED_ULE and libkse panicing > the box? The original post was about the reliability and performance of the various available kernel scheduler and threading library options. I mentioned that SCHED_ULE and libkse have done two nasty things to me in the past: 1) Panic my box when I start JBoss. 2) Lock IntelliJ IDEA. Since IntelliJ is a multithreaded Java application, the stability of the scheduler and the threading library have quite a lot to do with it. :-) I think I may have misunderstood your question. That, or you misunderstood my assertion, which is simply "SCHED_ULE and libkse are a reasonable combination lately". Ciao, Sheldon.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031121125242.GH18581>