Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:59:58 -0800
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>
Cc:        src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-stable-7@FreeBSD.org, Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com>
Subject:   Re: svn: stable/7/sys: conf dev/bce
Message-ID:  <4B162C8E.3090507@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B159540.9000503@fsn.hu>
References:  <200911151143.nAFBhTSD036619@svn.freebsd.org>	<4B141D2E.1000203@FreeBSD.org>	<4B142655.6030703@tomjudge.com>	<4B14382F.5080000@FreeBSD.org>	<20091130205141.2911011e.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4B14BF23.1030303@FreeBSD.org> <4B159540.9000503@fsn.hu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Attila Nagy wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>> Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:25:03 -0800
>>> Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> mentioned:
>>>
>>>> Can we change the name then? We've seen the similar issue without 
>>>> the jumbo frames, which made me wonder.
>>>
>>> It's strange, because 'normal' frames are less than a page size in 
>>> length,
>>> so the issue I was experiencing should not be reproducable with jumbo 
>>> frames
>>> disabled.  Can you describe a bit more what kind of problem you're 
>>> experiencing?
>>
>> The traffic through interface abruptly halts randomly when under a 
>> load, without any signs of a problem. What is interesting is that the 
>> communication through unix domain sockets appears to be down too, 
>> since some scripts that connect to database not able to complete as 
>> well, so whatever this problem is it affect the whole network 
>> subsystem. We tried to replace hardware and it did not help. Only 
>> after we replaced bce(4) with IntelPro card (em) the problem has went 
>> away.
> Sorry, I've just noticed this thread and did not read the earlier posts. 
> I can see similar, although only (at least for now) on version 8 
> (running something around RC2), also with bce interfaces and "heavy" -in 
> terms of pps, this is a DNS server- network load.
> 
> Everything which involves network halts for some minutes, but the 
> machine is completely usable from the console. top shows some processes 
> (I don't have an output, but as far as I can remember they were only 
> that which did network IO) in the "keglim" state.
> Then something happens and the machine starts to work again.
> 
> Can this be the same, or is it completely different?

It really looks like the same issue. Those boxes are heavy-duty VoIP 
switches, so that they are handling high PPS as well in our case.

-Maxim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B162C8E.3090507>