Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jul 1999 16:05:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: securelevel and ipfw zero
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907281604390.92555-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
In-Reply-To: <199907282000.OAA02728@mt.sri.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Nate Williams wrote:

> > Index: src/sys/netinet/ip_fw.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.114
> > diff -u -r1.114 ip_fw.c
> > --- ip_fw.c	1999/06/19 18:43:28	1.114
> > +++ ip_fw.c	1999/07/28 06:29:07
> > @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
> >  static int	add_entry __P((struct ip_fw_head *chainptr, struct ip_fw *frwl));
> >  static int	del_entry __P((struct ip_fw_head *chainptr, u_short number));
> >  static int	zero_entry __P((struct ip_fw *));
> > +static int	resetlog_entry __P((struct ip_fw *));
> >  static int	check_ipfw_struct __P((struct ip_fw *m));
> >  static __inline int
> >  		iface_match __P((struct ifnet *ifp, union ip_fw_if *ifu,
> > @@ -184,8 +185,8 @@
> >  
> >  	/* check for matching type in the bitmap */
> >  	if (type < IP_FW_ICMPTYPES_MAX &&
> > -		(f->fw_uar.fw_icmptypes[type / (sizeof(unsigned) * 8)] & 
> > -		(1U << (type % (8 * sizeof(unsigned))))))
> > +	    (f->fw_uar.fw_icmptypes[type / (sizeof(unsigned) * NBBY)] & 
> > +	     (1U << (type % (sizeof(unsigned) * NBBY)))))
> >  		return(1);
> >  
> >  	return(0); /* no match */
> 
> These are good bugfixes, and should be committed seperately.

Yes, this specific part shouldn't go in the same commit.

> 
> > @@ -302,14 +303,15 @@
> >  	struct ifnet *rif, struct ifnet *oif)
> >  {
> >      if (ip) {
> > +	struct tcphdr *const tcp = (struct tcphdr *)((u_int32_t *)ip+ip->ip_hl);
> > +	struct udphdr *const udp = (struct udphdr *)((u_int32_t *)ip+ip->ip_hl);
> > +	struct icmp *const icmp = (struct icmp *)((u_int32_t *)ip+ip->ip_hl);
> >  	static u_int64_t counter;
> > -	struct tcphdr *const tcp = (struct tcphdr *) ((u_int32_t *) ip+ ip->ip_hl);
> > -	struct udphdr *const udp = (struct udphdr *) ((u_int32_t *) ip+ ip->ip_hl);
> > -	struct icmp *const icmp = (struct icmp *) ((u_int32_t *) ip + ip->ip_hl);
> > -	int count;
> > +	u_int64_t count;
> 
> These are mostly change for changes sake, and make it difficult to see
> the functional changes.  Please limit your changes to changes, and not
> just to add stylistic differences.  While I may agree with them, they
> detract from the review process.

These were changes that were necessary to make ipfw readable enough that
I could work with it in this area. They aren't just to clean it up, or
just for change's sake. They need to stay in.

> 
> [ Rest deleted ]
> 
> Can you resend them to me in private email after you remove the
> white-space/stylistic changes?  Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> Nate
> 

 Brian Fundakowski Feldman      _ __ ___ ____  ___ ___ ___  
 green@FreeBSD.org                   _ __ ___ | _ ) __|   \ 
     FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!        _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
       http://www.FreeBSD.org/              _ |___/___/___/ 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907281604390.92555-100000>