Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:09:31 -0800 From: Douglas Thrift <douglaswth@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs Message-ID: <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/15/2016 2:46 PM, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 15.02.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: >>> it is not blocking in a hard way. >>> But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again, >>> you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user >>> can change. >> >> That's a valid point. >> >> Is there a reason for the gogs user to have /bin/sh instead >> of /usr/sbin/nologin ? > > yes, the shell is required, because the user will login using public ssh > key and then a git process is triggered to be able to push/pull via git. > > Gruß > Matthias > I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs" instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in your git urls: git clone git@example.com vs git clone gogs@example.com -- Douglas William Thrift <http://douglasthrift.net/>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56C25AAB.6000501>