Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:32:22 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Integration of ProPolice in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20080418163222.GC4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <f19c444a0804180737h6dda663fxae9d6d4e709cae20@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080418132749.GB4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <f19c444a0804180737h6dda663fxae9d6d4e709cae20@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Antoine, On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 04:37:06PM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: > Last time I looked at your patch, there was a problem when using > -fstack-protector-all instead of -fstack-protector: > when you compile lib/csu/*, gnu/lib/csu/*, or > src/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c with this flag, there is a kind of > chicken/egg problem and you end up with an unusable world. > That said, it would be great to be able to compile world with SSP when > an option is set in src.conf. I'm kind of surprised by this statement. I will give it a shot this evening. I'll let you know. Thanks. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080418163222.GC4840>