Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:34:18 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> To: Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/marketing os-comparison.sgml Message-ID: <20050722123418.GE594@gothic.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <200507191910.j6JJAg6a077939@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200507191910.j6JJAg6a077939@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 07:10:42PM +0000, Remko Lodder wrote: > remko 2005-07-19 19:10:42 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en/marketing os-comparison.sgml > Log: > Update the OS Comparison article. > > PR: www/82761 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=82761 This update disturbs me. By mentioning CERT advisories without an OS separation gives me the feeling that the document is missing its objective. Why not just give a link to CERT advisories list then? The previous "CERT Advisories in 2000 that affected Linux" and "CERT Advisories in 2000 that affected Windows" parts were an interesting advocacy argument. I don't think phpBB or Oracle vulns well push people to use FreeBSD, etc. Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050722123418.GE594>