Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 23:31:16 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Peter van Dijk <peter@dataloss.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FIFOs & select: what about our implementation? Message-ID: <20000905233114.A71862@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20000905192458.A1428@dataloss.net>; from peter@dataloss.net on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:24:58PM %2B0200 References: <20000905195056.A67326@nagual.pp.ru> <20000905192458.A1428@dataloss.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:24:58PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > select return code -1 with wrong errno == 0. Sorry, I was wrong about errno, it returns that descriptor is ready for read while there is nothing to read. > I surely do think this behaviour is broken. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=19871 I disagree about Bruce comment on that. If we have nothing to read, select must be timed out. It is not non-blocking read call but select. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000905233114.A71862>