Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 22:59:44 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: telnetd update? Message-ID: <20010725225944.A84940@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIKEHAEKAA.deepak@ai.net>; from deepak@ai.net on Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 01:12:39AM -0400 References: <20010725214528.A43468@xor.obsecurity.org> <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIKEHAEKAA.deepak@ai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 01:12:39AM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote: >=20 > Thanks, I did read the advisory. >=20 > On the machines I am involved with the patch worked beautifully, no > questions asked. >=20 > A customer decided to download the lib and libexec trees from -current, > installed them over their 4.3 sources, in the correct place, and did make > clean; make depend; make install on telnetd there. >=20 > I know the patch had 14 modifications, I thought someone would be friendly > enough to let me know if the above approach was fatally flawed. Yes; don't mix and match sources from different branches. That's almost guaranteed to wrong, even more than if you took them from a substantially different version of -stable. Kris --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7X7HPWry0BWjoQKURAkGvAJsHEYOo0ebjYSxwXCV+Mekg4Yo0lwCdHVtO S9tTvYurTTZzWU6mSNLzQ5w= =Akta -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010725225944.A84940>