Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:21:34 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Subject:   Re: ports/162049: The Ports tree lacks a framework to restart services
Message-ID:  <4EAF2D7E.8030209@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EAE7B59.7010104@bsdforen.de>
References:  <20111027091500.GM63910@hoeg.nl> <20111027162715.GB1012@sysmon.tcworks.net> <4EAE401B.2040704@FreeBSD.org> <4EAE5075.6030102@bsdforen.de> <4EAE5E2D.3060209@FreeBSD.org> <4EAE7B59.7010104@bsdforen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/31/2011 03:41, Dominic Fandrey wrote:

> What has to be done after an update is often very specific, though.

That's why I proposed that there should be a knob for the port
maintainer to include the standard version of the script, or not. If
there are more heavily customized things that need to be done for the
particular service than a custom pkg-install/pkg-deinstall script is
going to be needed.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EAF2D7E.8030209>