Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:38:08 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Conrad Sabatier <conrads@cox.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bash2 or devfs problem? 
Message-ID:  <5257.1047339488@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:50:11 CST." <XFMail.20030310155011.conrads@cox.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <XFMail.20030310155011.conrads@cox.net>, Conrad Sabatier writes:
>I've noticed that bash's process substitution fails under -CURRENT.
>
>For (an admittedly stupid, trivial) example:
>
>diff <(cat file1) <(cat file2)
>
>errors out with:
>
>diff: /dev/fd/63: No such file or directory
>diff: /dev/fd/62: No such file or directory
>
>Apparently, the nodes for the named pipes are not being created as they should.
>
>Is this a bash problem, or something in devfs not working as expected?

That's a good question...

Has anybody found out what the standards conformant thing is for /dev/fd ?

presently we do only 0,1 & 2, with the std{in,out,err} symlinks.

If we are required to do all filedescriptors, we should do so with
fdescfs by default.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5257.1047339488>