Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Oct 1997 13:42:14 +0200
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
Subject:   Re: static vs dynamic compiling...
Message-ID:  <19971005134214.NH30632@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.971005043836.220g-100000@thelab.hub.org>; from The Hermit Hacker on Oct 5, 1997 04:38:48 -0300
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96.971005043836.220g-100000@thelab.hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> 	I'm curious as to why I get the following error when attempting
> to compile using -static:
> 
> gcc -static pg_dump.o common.o  -o pg_dump -L../../interfaces/libpq -lpq \
> 	-L/usr/local/lib -lcrypt -lcompat -lln -lm -lreadline -ltermcap \
> 	-lcurses 
> ld: No reference to __DYNAMIC
> gmake: *** [pg_dump] Error 1

Because dlopen(3) & friends are only available on dynamically linked
binaries (in our a.out, as i understand it).

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971005134214.NH30632>