Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 22:16:46 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Missing stack frames in kgdb/ddb traces Message-ID: <20011009215623.V25090-100000@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200110081423.aa55254@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <20011008214808.S17093-100000@delplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: > >I think debuggers should be taught about the main entry points Xintr* > >and Xfastintr* instead. The current Xresume* labels are not used > >except by debuggers. These labels are only used by debuggers because > >they hide the labels for the main entry points of the interrupt handlers. > >Note that Xsyscall is already handled like this. I think support for > >it was broken in gdb by the evil syscall_with_err_pushed changes. > > Ah, I missed why the Xresume labels were there originally. Below > is a patch that removes the Xresume labels, and makes gdb and ddb > check for the Xintr/Xfastintr labels instead. I like this version. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011009215623.V25090-100000>