Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 22:14:25 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: FreeBSD-Current <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: nullfs & current Message-ID: <19971019221425.28468@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <531.877289803@critter.freebsd.dk>; from Poul-Henning Kamp on Sun, Oct 19, 1997 at 09:36:43PM %2B0200 References: <19971019153325.26490@keltia.freenix.fr> <531.877289803@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Poul-Henning Kamp: > And then when the vnode comes down VOP_INACTIVE and VOP_RECLAIM will > trigger the actual removal. (Somebody might have the file open, remember ?) That's how I understand it but in this case, the blocks are not reclaimed even though it is supposed to be the last close of the file. There is a refcount one higher than it should be. The nullfs is by itself very simple and I don't see where :-( -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: There are no limits -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #41: Sat Oct 18 18:47:01 CEST 1997
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971019221425.28468>