Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:23:30 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
Cc:        Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
Subject:   Re: weak implementation of threads has problems - kse fix attached
Message-ID:  <20040608072330.GA82183@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040608054127.GB3604@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au>
References:  <20040608051347.GA3604@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406080126400.27228-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20040608054127.GB3604@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 03:41:27PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:34:33AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, John Birrell wrote:
> >=20
> > > [ cross-post lists cut back, ports added 8-) ]
> > >=20
> > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:48:45PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > > A good addition to bsd.port.mk, right next to the "possible network
> > > > server" etc checks, might be to run ldd on all installed shared
> > > > libraries and print a warning if any threads libraries show up.  Th=
ere
> > > > are a huge number of ports that install shlibs linked to libpthread=
s.
> > >=20
> > > Good idea.
> >=20
> > Just picking a message at random to reply to...
> >=20
> > In case anyone wonders why we don't use strong references, I chose to
> > mimic what Solaris does:
> >=20
> >   bash-2.05$ nm /lib/libpthread.so.1 | grep pthread_mutex_lock
> >   0000000000003c80 T _pthread_mutex_lock
> >   0000000000003c80 W pthread_mutex_lock
> >=20
> >   bash-2.05$ nm /lib/libc.so.1 | grep pthread_mutex_lock
> >   0000000000096c38 W _pthread_mutex_lock
> >   0000000000096c38 W pthread_mutex_lock
> >=20
> > It is also easy to provide your own version of pthread_foo() without
> > having any strong references override it.
>=20
> Despite the heat-of-the-moment on amd64, FWIW, using linpthread on i386
> on a clean machine with NOLIBC_R set in /etc/make.conf, nothing in libmap=
.conf
> and just normal ports builds, gnome, mplayer, mozilla, openoffice etc work
> fine for me on current (except for the ACPI kernel problems which should
> either be fixed or backed out IMNSHO).

Yeah, some time last year I went through and fixed or marked BROKEN
all the ports that link explicitly to libc_r, and I think they've all
been fixed to use PTHREAD_LIBS.

Kris

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAxWlyWry0BWjoQKURAsj6AJ0QnxMzXMhvgv3/xYy4yYS1ZmOWTgCfbRvK
za48KdtyUiXT3yDIpvIFw1U=
=1lNE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040608072330.GA82183>