Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:56:06 +0100 From: spellberg_robert <emailrob@emailrob.com> To: fbsd_chat <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [_fbsd_chat_] why the different eol lengths ? [ was: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 7.2 EoL coming soon ] Message-ID: <4C0E7626.3090807@emailrob.com> References: <4C0A67E7.3080405@freebsd.org> <4C0E5712.2000606@emailrob.com> <86eigho2m2.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i understand about limited resources forcing the number down. that is not my point. this may be a semantics game, but, in general, do fbsd project_people consider the right_most digit[s] to be a "minor_version number", a "patch_level" or something_else ? the answer may help clarify my thinking for my follow_up. rob
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0E7626.3090807>